Issue link: http://connect.avant.org.au/i/754563
Avant Connect 4 Dr Smith* assessed and treated Mr Jones* during a consultation. What followed over the next few years, however, was: ▸ a coronial inquest ▸ an investigation by AHPRA ▸ a civil claim for damages. The lead-up Dr Smith is a GP with more than 20 years' experience who works in a busy suburban practice. She had treated Mr Jones intermittently for many years and saw his wife and children frequently. She was their regular GP and knew them well. Mr Jones appeared to be a healthy 40-year-old man who did not drink or smoke. He was not overweight and did not suffer from hypertension or diabetes. He had mild to moderate hypercholesterolaemia for which Dr Smith had prescribed Lipitor. In December 2011 Mr Jones attended the practice with his wife and two young children. When they arrived, Mrs Jones told reception staff that Mr Jones had been suffering chest pain. Reception staff asked them to take a seat in the waiting room and a practice nurse was called. Dr Smith saw the Jones family in the waiting room and noticed Mr Jones playing with his young children. She assumed they were there for the children's immunisations. One consultation three investigations Mia Campbell BA (Hons), LLB (Hons) Solicitor, Avant Law, VIC More than just legal support I've worked closely with Dr Smith over the last few years and I value the relationship we have built. I think the continuing relationship means we can communicate successfully and frankly. The coroner's inquest was especially difficult for Dr Smith and I hope I was able to provide more than just legal support throughout this time. Working so closely on this matter means I'm familiar with the smallest details of the events surrounding the patient's death. And the detail in this claim is particularly important. Professional Conduct Civil/Compensation Coronial Employment Medicare Privacy * Names have been changed.

